1. exp clinical trials/
2. exp randomized controlled trials/
3. exp double-blind method/
4. exp single-blind method/
5. exp cross-over studies/
6. randomized controlled trial.pt.
7. clinical trial.pt.
8. controlled clinical trial.pt.
9. (clinic$ adj2 trial).mp.
10. (random$ adj5 control$ adj5 trial$).mp.
11. (crossover or cross-over).mp.
12. ((singl$ or double$ or trebl$ or tripl$) adj (blind$ or mask$)).mp.
13. randomi$.mp.
14. (random$ adj5 (assign$ or allocat$ or assort$ or reciev$)).mp.
15. or/1-14
16. exp SCHIZOPHRENIA/
17. exp Paranoid Disorders/
18. schizo$.mp.
19. hebephreni$.mp.
20. oligophreni$.mp.
21. psychotic$.mp.
22. psychosis.mp.
23. psychoses.mp.
24. ((chronic$ or sever$) adj2 mental$ adj2 (ill$ or disorder$)).mp.
25. exp dyskinesia, drug-induced/
26. exp psychomotor agitation/
27. exp neuroleptic malignant syndrome/
28. exp "diagnosis, dual (psychiatry)"/
29. (tardiv$ adj dyskine$).mp.
30. akathisi$.mp.
31. acathisi$.mp.
32. (neuroleptic$ and (malignant adj2 syndrome)).mp.
33. (neuroleptic$ and (movement and disorder$)).mp.
34. parkinsoni$.mp.
35. neuroleptic-induc$.mp.
36. or/29-35
37. 36 not (parkinson's adj1 disease).ti.
38. or/16-28
39. 37 or 38
40. 15 and 39
Yes, good to see some NOTs. It will promote sensitivity of the searching results.
回覆刪除我真的很少使用NOT,我比較常使limit,因為大多時候只清楚自己想查什麼資料,但不太知道不要什麼。請問老師limit與NOT的功用不同嗎?
回覆刪除